Torture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Torture - Essay ExampleBut after a while we start to curiosity what security can possibly mean, when so much of what people have struggled to secure in this countrythe Constitution, basic human rights, and the rule of lawseems to be going out the window. Convention Against Torture (http//www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html) Article 3 1. No State political party shall expel, return (refouler) or extradite a person to another State where at that place argon substantial movement for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent material body of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights. Article 4 1. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its evil law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit tort ure and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture. 2. Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature. Christopher Hitchens (http//www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808?currentPage=2) Torture advocates hide behind the argument that an open discussion intimately specific American interrogation techniques will aid the enemy. Yet, convicted Al Qaeda members and innocent captives who were released to their host nations have already debriefed the world through hundreds of interviews, movies and documentaries on only what methods they were subjected to and how they endured. Our own missteps have created a cadre of highly experienced lecturers for Al Qaedas own virtualsereschool for terrorists. Which returns us to my start point, about the distinction between trainingfor something and training to resist it. One used to be toldand surely with truththat th e lethal fanatics of al-Qaeda were schooled to lie, and instructed to claim that they had been tortured and maltreated whether they had been tortured and maltreated or not. Did we notice what a frontier we had crossed when we admitted and even proclaimed that their stories might in fact be dead on target? I had only a very slight encounter on that frontier, but I still wish that my experience were the only way in which the words waterboard and American could be mentioned in the same (gasping and sobbing) breath. Michael Levin (http//people.brandeis.edu/teuber/torture.html) There are situations in which torture is not merely permissible but morally mandatory. Moreover, these situations are moving from the realm of imagination to fact. Suppose a terrorist has hidden an atomic bomb on Manhattan Island which will detonate at noon on July 4 unless ... here follow the usual demands for money and release of his friends from jail. Suppose, further, that he is caught at 10 a.m on the fatefu l day, but preferring death to failure, wont disclose where the bomb is. What do we do? If we follow due process, wait for his lawyer, arraign him, millions of people will die. If the only way to save those lives is to subject the terrorist to the most excruciating possible pain, what grounds can there be for not doing so? I suggest there are none. In any case, I ask